AFFINITY
BY
SARAH WATERS
THE
BLURB:-
'Now you know why
you are drawn to me- why your flesh comes creeping to mine and what
it comes for. Let it creep.'
From the dark heart of
a Victorian prison, disgraced spiritualist Selina Dawes waves an
enigmatic spell. Is she a fraud or a prodigy? By the time it all
begins to matter, you'll find yourself desperately wanting to believe
in magic.
THE
REALITY:-
Yawn.. This novel
really knew how to draw itself out. After 30 pages I put it to one
side and read another book from start to finish. I picked up the
thread quite easily, but I could not really get into this story until
about page 100. Even then, I found myself surreptitiously looking to
check what page I was on- and therefore how many I had left to go!
I've read Tipping The
Velvet (very good), Fingersmith (very good), The Nightwatch (good but
drawn out and tedious) and The Little Stranger (okay) by the same
author and have seen the television adaptations of the first three.
I have to say that these stories come across a lot better on TV than
on paper. I'm all for descriptiveness and getting into the minds of
the characters but this author can certainly make things drag a bit.
I loved the subject
matter and have always believed in ghosts. Why? Not just because I
have seen one (a very well-documented grey lady in a haunted hotel in
Norfolk) but because I like to keep an open mind about such things
and there are too many recorded sightings of ghosts to dismiss the
matter completely. I know the Victorians found the supernatural
fascinating and I also know that there were a lot of fraudsters about
who took advantage of such things. The London location of a grim
female prison was enthralling and the characters interesting; Selina
being one hell of an enigmatic, talented actress...
I could see the fact
that (spoiler alert!) Margaret was going to be defrauded coming and
that would have been true had I not previously read a review of this
book that revealed one of the protagonists. I suspected that this
villain (or maybe villain's puppet?) of the piece was in cahoots with
someone in Margaret's house but I didn't work out that these two
people were actually one and the same, and now I've read the novel it
seems so obvious.
It wasn't until page
329 (23 pages from the end!) that the book started to get really
enthralling, which was, unfortunately a bit too long a wait. I
also felt very daft in missing the fact that not all the prison
officers were going to be as white as snow and as honest as the day
is long- in retrospect it is something stupidly obvious to overlook!
A word to the author-
find another adjective other than queer. I saw it used so many times
that I was tempted to highlight the “queers” and count them
later. Fortunately, a search online revealed that that task had
already been done and forty uses of queer in one novel is way
too much. We know that you're a lesbian and we don't care, so please
give the double-entendre references a rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment